Most major news websites don’t use WordPress

I’m really interested in content management systems, and which sites use them. Out of curiosity, I’ve done a bit of research to find out which CMS is used the most. I was surprised by the results.

Takeaway

If my research is correct, it shows that most major news websites don’t use WordPress.

CMS usage across news websites

Note: if international versions of a site exist, the UK edition is linked below.

Property CMS
BBC News Bespoke
Business Insider Bespoke
Buzzfeed Bespoke
City A.M. Bespoke *
CNET Bespoke
Express Bespoke
FT Bespoke
Guardian Bespoke
Independent Drupal 7
Mail Online Bespoke
Mashable Bespoke
Metro WordPress (VIP)
Mirror Bespoke
New York Times Bespoke
Quartz WordPress (VIP)
ReadWrite Bespoke
Reuters Bespoke
Standard Drupal 7
Star Bespoke
Sun Bespoke *
TechCrunch WordPress (VIP)
Telegraph Escenic
The Times Bespoke
TNW (The Next Web) WordPress
The Verge Chorus *
Vox Chorus *
Washington Post WordPress + Bespoke
Methode?
More info (27 Aug 2015)
More info (11 Mar 2016)
WSJ (Wall Street Journal) Bespoke

Footnotes

  • City A.M. is mostly bespoke, but some parts are Drupal.
  • The Sun appears to be bespoke, but BuiltWith.com suggests it is using WordPress.
  • The Verge and Vox.com use Chorus, created by Vox Media. Technically speaking this is a bespoke product, and is currently used by Vox Media only.

Methods of checking

Viewing the page source of a website can give a few telltale signs as to the CMS that’s being used:

  • WordPress is fairly easy to spot from the page source – “wp-content” in asset URLs is fairly common. WordPress VIP, or at least WordPress.com with a custom URL, will show a black navbar at the top of the site if you’re logged in.
  • Drupal usually inserts a “meta generator” tag. If that’s missing, you can often tell a Drupal site from the /node/ URLs (if unchanged from the default settings) or the /taxonomy/term/xxx URLs for tagging.
  • Some platforms, such as Chorus, make their presence known at the top of the source code as an HTML comment.
  • Bespoke is harder to spot – generally if it’s not clear which CMS a site is using, it may be bespoke. Of course, that’s not a hard and fast rule.
  • I’ve verified my findings with BuiltWith.com, although it doesn’t give 100% confirmation that a site is using a bespoke CMS.

Disclaimer

I cannot guarantee the table is 100% accurate. It’s quite possible that some of the sites I’ve listed as “bespoke” use an off-the-shelf CMS for the back-end publishing, with front-end output being rendered via a bespoke engine. Leave a comment or drop me an email if you know of anything that should be corrected.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s